detail from Frida as Seahorse,
graphite on cotton rag, 2012
Kate Samworth
and more pleasure reading on Georges Perrault and Jacques de Seve
a short piece on the question of the "ideal form" here
on Johann Jakob Scheuchzer https://jcblibrary.org/bound-images-stillo
Adam Naming the Animals from Northumberland Bestiary (text in Latin), English, about 1250–1260, artist unknown
The Physiologus is an un-illustrated collection of ancient writings about the natural world that was compiled in the 2nd century in Alexandria. It was written in Greek, translated into Latin, Armenian, Ethiopian, Syriac, and several European and Middle Eastern languages, which demonstrates the scope of its appeal.
It included descriptions and moral content of real and imaginary animals and birds and sometimes plants and minerals. The majority of the allegories and symbols of nature that were used in ecclesiastical art and poetic literature throughout the Middle Ages can be found in the Physiologus and it serves as the basis for countless bestiaries produces as illuminated manuscripts.
The book is a didactic Christian text, though they were not the first or last to seek moral instruction from the natural world.
For example, the beaver symbolizes the pursuit of holiness. According to the bestiary, it is hunted for its private parts because of their medicinal value. So the beaver will castrate himself and leave his sack for the hunter to save himself. He will show future hunters that he has already been castrated and be left alone. Likewise, Satan would leave the Christian alone who has nothing of value and so the beaver is a symbol of the Christian who sacrifices everything to pursue holiness.
The coot builds a nest in the water, usually on top of a rock. When a storm approaches, it returns to the nest or dives underwater. This bird symbolizes the faithful Christian who remains loyal to the church and refuses to chase after heresy.
For more Christian animal symbols:
Until the 12th century, Illuminated manuscripts were produced by monks. Monasteries were the centers of learning and the books they produced were usually religious. They produced Bibles, books of Gospel, and prayer books.
Occasionally they were commissioned by rulers or high-ranking clergy to copy historical records or Greek and Roman literature.
Since all of the books were copies of another, a monk (or more) may have needed to travel to another monastery to access the original.
Production usually involved multiple experts. The calligraphy was often done by one person, the illustrations by another (or others), and the gold leafing by yet another. Then the book was sewn and bound. The cover might be carved from wood or ivory, or covered in embossed leather or filigree or gems. Special clasps and corners could be the work of a metalsmith.
With the rise of universities and a growing middle class, book production started to have commercial value and was done by others. A bookseller would receive an order, then hire a production team. Most scribes could write in a few different styles, and the purchaser would select the style. The range of topics expanded to include anything related to natural history, literature, fiction, travel tales, and more.
the themes of the text could be expounded upon in the drolleries (marginal illustrations) and historiated initials.
unknown illuminator
fourth quarter of 13th century (after 1277)
Handcolored woodcuts from the Hortus Sanitatus by unknown artists, published in 1485
The Hortus Sanitatis is one of the earliest printed publications on nature and popular medicine. It mimicked earlier medicinal illuminated manuscripts called herbals and combined descriptions of rocks and minerals and countless species of mammals, birds, and fish and their medicinal uses and preparations. It also includes mythical animals, superstitions, treatments based on the doctrine of signatures, and some medical treatments that require parts of imaginary beings. The animal illustrations were stylized and not intended for use in species identification.
It was published first by Peter Schofer in 1484 with the title “Herbaria,” and a year later by Jacob Meydenbach with the title Hortus Sanitatis. A foreword in the first edition says, “Here follows the book of nature which treats first the peculiarities and nature of man, then of the nature and the properties of the heavens, of beasts, of birds, of plants, of stones and of many other natural things.”
Matthaus Merian, 1657
Konrad Gessner, 1569
The study of zoology in Europe remained fairly stagnant until the 16th century. One of the most impactful contributors to the field was Konrad Gessner. Like his contemporaries, he was influenced by Aristotle's writing and used it as basis for his own research.
Gessner was a prolific writer and is considered the father of modern zoology. (we've discussed his contributions in botany)
His greatest contribution to the study of nature was his Historia Animalium, a 5 volume encyclopedia that attempts to describe all animals known (at least by Europeans) by 1565, based on a combination of his own research and information from old sources, such as the Old Testament, Aristotle, Pliny, folklore, and earlier bestiaries, as well as species recently discovered in the New World and East Indies.
He also incorporated information acquired from contemporary naturalists, though he could not always confirm the accuracy of their contributions.
One of the challenges that he and his contemporaries faced was identifying similar species based on centuries of varied and sometimes conflicting descriptions or illustrations. Through the centuries of copying and translating, there were countless misunderstandings and inconsistencies. The task of 16th century naturalists was to find the reliable portions of these texts and to determine exactly which species was being described. Before the period of exploration that allowed easier access to animals on other continents, naturalists relied on descriptions written by travelers who weren't trained in the methods used by naturalists .
Gessner worked from first hand observation, conducted dissections, and compared his observations to the written word. He tried to sort the real from the imaginary in the work of the ancients, but made some mistakes of his own. Narwhal horns had been mistaken for unicorn horns by many naturalists, and after combing through the Bible and classical and medieval writings on the subject, he accepted the horns as proof of the unicorn's existence. (this belief persisted until the 19th century)
He even included a section on distinguishing a real horn from a fake and repeated the claim that the horn could cure epilepsy or counteract poison.
for more on Gessner's unicorn
and more images from his book found here
Gesner included the names and etymology of each animal in multiple languages; epithets and metaphors for each; sounds each made; and observations on diet, habitat, and behavior. He described the variation in similar species found in different locations and discussed all of the ways that the animals have been incorporated into human culture. He included the uses, medicinal uses or nutritional value of various animals, and instructions on slaughter and cooking. He also included unproven theories on animal traits, for example, that elephants love their own country, worship the sun, moon, and stars, are chaste, and hate mice.
The illustrations were created by a number of illustrators, including Gessner, but only one received credit- an artist named Lucas Schan. Gessner did the majority of the illustrations in the bird volume.
Aldrovandi was a monumental figure of the evolution of science during the Renaissance.
Aldrovandi described himself as a modern-day Aristotle and wrote over 400 books on natural history, though just a small fraction were published. However, his 13 volume series on the natural world was published and included three volumes on birds, three on quadrupeds, and the rest included serpents and dragons, mollusks and crustaceans, fish, insects, trees, fossils, and monsters.
The drawings, paintings, and wood engravings were created by a number of artists.
Aldrovandi studied philosophy, logic, medicine, and law became the first professor of natural history at the U of Bologna, where he helped establish a botanical garden for research.
He also amassed a collection of at least 18,000 specimens, acquired from European explorations of Asia, Africa, and the New World. Much of the naturalia was donated by fellow naturalists who were impressed by his knowledge and eager to contribute to one of the largest collections of the century. His museum served an important role in the development of taxonomy.
He spread knowledge of and curiosity about the natural world through his teaching, his massive collection of naturalia, and his role in founding the botanical garden and was an important source of information for his contemporaries.
read about his entanglement in religious conflict between Protestants and Catholics here
He compiled 13 volumes on natural history that covered birds; insects; mollusks and crustaceans; fish; mammals; minerals; serpents and dragons, and creatures from folklore and legend. He included information on the distribution of species and the various names for each species; their dietary and medicinal uses; details of sexual habits and reproduction; and cultural references- such as their image used on coins, emblems, or heiroglyphs; and reference to them in verse or prose.
The publication of the series was an enormous collaborative effort between collectors, transcribers, and illustrators. He commissioned artists to illustrate every specimen in the book and oversaw the production, which involved draftsmen, woodcutters, and painters.
His wife, Francesca Fontana, was a crucial partner in his research. She researched texts for him to cite, wrote some sections of his books and did the editing and shared responsibilities in the writing of On the Remains of Bloodless Animals, published after his death.
In fact, little of his writing was published during his lifetime- it was the collection that made him famous.
for further reading
Andrea Alciato, aka Alciati, developed the emblem, which originally consisted of a title or motto and an epigram (a brief, often clever or humorous description written in verse). The texts frequently included morals and were inspired by Aesop's fables, the natural philosophies of Pliny and Aristotle, and Medieval bestiaries. Alciato used puns and allusions, and sometimes presented conflicting ideas or layers of symbolism. His intention was to inspire interpretation, conversation, and amusement among his readers.
A collection of his writings were published in 1531, under the title Emblemata. Without his permission, the publisher added illustrations to the text, thereby establishing the three-part emblem that countless other writers would imitate over the next several decades. Emblemata inspired a new genre, and emblem books on a vast array of secular and religious themes were published across Europe, such as birds and mammals; devotion and prayer; love and romance; alchemy; family crests; weaponry; and much more.
The majority of Alciato's emblems were not related to plants and animals, but they reflected the ongoing belief that humans could find moral instruction by observing animal behavior. The "emblematic" or symbolic meanings were more important to the European Christians of this era than the biological particulars. Contemplating images of nature could reveal the multiple hidden meanings of the cosmos.
The two most influential naturalists of the era, Conrad Gessner and Ulisse Aldrovandi, often included Alciato's writings in their encyclopedias on the natural world.
The motto for the image of this avian hunter translates to "those who contemplate the heights come to grief." He is focused on the bird overhead and doesn't notice the snake about to bite his foot.
Above the image is written "in adulatores," (flatterers), followed by the explanation that like a sycophant, the chameleon changes its colors to conform to its surroundings.
The caption above the fox studying a mask reads, in Latin, "a mind is better than a pretty face"
pleasure viewing: Symbolorum & Emblematum ex Animalibus by Joachin Camerarius, inspired by Alciato
Pierre Belon (1517-1564) studied botany and medicine and was a pioneer in comparative anatomy. He attempted to identify the birds found in the writings of Aristotle and Pliny and compare them to the species found in France.
His books include descriptions of the similarities and differences between human and various mammal skeletons.
He rose to prominence in the field and was sent by the French king, Francis I, to Constantinople with a group of diplomats to study the nature of the region. He then spent three years traveling throughout the Levant, gathering information on flora and fauna as well as on the people and places, and compiled first hand accounts of the flora, fauna, people, and places in a work called “Observations of many singular and memorable things found in Greece, Asia, Judea, Egypt, aramia, and other foreign countries”
With funding from the French government, his studies of fish, trees, and birds were published in 3 separate volumes in the mid-1500s.
The woodcuts were based on drawings done by observing specimens- more often living than dead. He did some of the drawings, but several other artists were involved, though only one- Pierre Goudet- was credited.
His expedition would be repeated or imitated for many generations of scientific travelers, like Linnaeus and Darwin.
Georges -Louis LeClerc, aka the Compte du Buffon, was a prominent naturalist of the 18th century.
He came from a wealthy family and inherited a significant amount of wealth when his mother died, which enabled him to buy a position in King Louis the XVI's court, working as director of the King’s Garden.
Among his duties was to oversee the cataloguing of the king's collection. While working on the descriptions, LeClerc developed his own theories on natural history, and published a book on natural history Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particuliere . He covered all categories of natural science that were studied at that time, including physics, chemistry, technology, material science, and of course, the natural history of animals.
Le Clerc noticed in his travels that despite similar environments, there were important variations in similar flora and fauna from one place to the next and theorized that a species might improve or decline once it left its original point of creation.
He never developed a cohesive explanation, but he recognized the connection between species variations and geography, which Darwin explained as adaptation several decades later.
In the mid-18th century, LeClerc pointed out the similarities between men and apes and suggested that the Earth may be older than stated in the Bible. the church publicly demanded that he retract these statements, but there were no consequences when he didn't.
The illustrations were created by multiple artists, the most famous of whom is Jacques de Seve. His etchings depict the birds and animals in theatrical landscapes, adding elegance, drama, and scale, even if not scientifically accurate. De Seve's landscapes use details to allude to the continent where the animal might be found, such as geographical features, famous ruins or cities, or people in native costumes.
The inclusion of a more detailed landscape or background in natural history illustration emerged during the 15th century and by the 18th century was common practice.
Comte du Buffon's “la poulpe colossae,”from his Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques 1805 (based on travelers’ tales of giant squid, which are much smaller than pictured here and do not attack ships)
Le Clerc, cont.
He noticed in his travels that despite similar environments, there were important variations in similar flora and fauna from one place to the next and theorized that a species might improve or decline once it left its original point of creation. This was related to the theory of adaption that Darwin would develop several decades later.
LeClerc also suggested that change in climate may have driven species from their original homes.
He compiled all existing knowledge on geology and anthropology and published his suppositions on the history and age of the earth and the degeneration of animals species. He experiment with cooling iron spheres pulled from the fire and calculated that the earth was 75,000 years old, which was radical at the time since the current estimations put it closer to 7,000 years old.
He wrote in prose rather than use overly scientific language and appealed to a wide audience.
LeClerc rejected some important current advances in science, claiming that finding order in nature was not helpful and rejected the usefulness of the microscope- a newly refined tool- in understanding nature.
The intro to his book criticized Linnaeus’ system of taxonomy, questioned the usefulness of math, and outlined a history of Earth that contradicted the teachings of the church.
Professional engravers copied animal illustrations by Jacques de Seve and bird illustrations by Francois-Nicolas Martinet. The illustrations are aesthetically pleasing and anatomically correct. The settings are imaginative- sometimes dreamlike or referring to myths.
Animal illustrations for Georges Louis LeClerc's Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particuliere were created by Jacques de Seve, birds by Francois-Nicolas Martinet.
In the mid-18th century, he introduced a couple of important radical ideas by pointing out the similarities between men and apes and suggesting that the Earth may be older than stated in the Bible. He attempted to explain the species variations based on geography in ways that edged towards Darwin’s theory of evolution, though he never developed a cohesive explanation.
He was criticized for questioning the veracity of Genesis and thereby destroying human values and told to recant his ideas about geology and the age of Earth, but there were no consequences for him.
Illustrations for LeClerc's Histoire by Jacques de Seve
He insisted that the New World was inferior to Eurasia, and that the humans and animals here were smaller and weaker than their European counterparts because of the damp climate. He claimed that the water was stagnant and that the weakened constitutions of animals was caused by the “noxious vapors” produced in rotting swamps and sunless forests.
This theory was accepted without proof and printed in several papers around Europe. It mattered very much to the Americans, as they were seeking immigrants and European investors to help expand settlements in the new republic and they took it as a threat to their growth and prosperity.
Thomas Jefferson and Charles Willson Peale put much energy into disproving this theory. While serving as a diplomat in France, Jefferson wrote to the governor of New Hampshire and asked him to send the full skeletons of a moose, caribou, or elk to Jefferson while in Paris. He specified that the horns, hooves, and skin should be left intact to show their full size. He also created charts comparing the sizes of animals on both continents. Unfortunately, LeClerc died before the matter was settled.
(1769- 1832)
Cuvier studied fossils and was the first to recognize that some animals no longer existed, which contradicted the understanding of nature and creation as static.
He demonstrated that the fossilized bones belonged to extinct species and reconstructed some of the lost species in his book, Discours sur les Revolutions du Globe. This book proposed that a series of catastrophic events on the earth’s surface caused the sudden extinction of animals.
He dissected and drew almost all forms of animal life and established the foundations of vertebrate paleontology and comparative anatomy. He was influenced by the work of botanist Antoine-Laurent de Jussiue, who demonstrated that not all the characteristics of plants were of equal significance in classifying them and applied that to zoology to create a new system of classification.
He discovered the illustrations of Buffon’s Histoire Naturelle as a youth and then devoured the writings of Linneaus and Aristotle, and began researching and writing about the animal kingdom. He was a prolific writer and formulated a classification system of the animal kingdom that is as important as Linnaeus’ work on plants.
He was appointed as professor of animal anatomy of the natural history museum in Paris and created an immense collection of over 16,000 specimens, which were arranged to show the relationships between form and function, rejecting the notion of the Great Chain of Being. His collection inspired several imitations in museums around Europe.
He held several very important positions, including perpetual secretary of the Academy of Sciences and was given several official posts in education and science under Napoleon.
His understanding of comparative anatomy was key to his extraordinary discovery- he recognized that the teeth of fossil mammoths found in Siberia were not elephants, as previously believed, but that of the woolly mammoth- an extinct species.
He also identified other extinct species, including the Pterodactyl and a large marine lizard called a Varans.
He separated the animal kingdom into the following groups:
Vertebrates
Articulata (arthropods)
Mollusca (mollusks)
Radiata (starfish, jellyfish, etc.)
He collaborated with Achille Valenciennes on an encyclopedia of fish, which described all known species in a 22 volume set that described 4000, half of which were documented for the first time in their work.
was a Swiss naturalist and author of Kupfer-Bibel, aka Physica Sacra, which covered plants, animals, and natural phenomena mentioned in the Bible. The book was published around 1735 and was intended to demonstrate its authenticity through the lens of natural history.
He collected fossils and studied and mapped the strata of Switzerland. He was a "diluvialist," meaning that he believed that fossils and rock strata were deposited in Noah's Great Flood.
He was a of natural theologian who believed that God had created "two books," the Book of Scripture and the Book of Nature, and that to learn about God, one should study the natural world and the Bible.
His book combined the book of Genesis and excerpts from the Bible with 760 copperplate engravings that refer to the related discoveries in natural history. For example, the creation of Adam from dust (far left) is contrasted by the development process of the humans that followed is included in the frame and based on the work of Frederick Ruysch.
Left is an illustration from Genesis 1:1 that provides a diagram of the universe including Galileo's four moons of Jupiter and the recently discovered moons of Saturn. (link to article here)
to see the extraordinary book, go here
Evidence of keeping menageries or zoos dates as far back as 1150 BCE to the Chinese emperor Wen Wang, who kept a 900 acre "Park of Knowledge" that held assorted species of deer, birds, and fish. There are also descriptions of such menageries in ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia, and the Aztec empire.
By the 15th century, it was common practice for royalty to give and receive living animals as gifts for diplomatic purposes- an early form of lobbying. Some artists had access to these menageries and were able to draw imported animals from observation.
Lorenzo de Medici wanted a collection of exotic animals to compete with the legendary spectacle created by Julius Ceasar. Ceasar returned from conquests in Asia Minor and Egypt with an array of lions, panthers, monkeys, and exotic birds, which he paraded through the streets in a demonstration of wealth and power.
At the end of the 15th century, the Medicis received a giraffe from the Burji Sultan of Egypt as part of a diplomatic agreement
with the Florentines. The animal was supposed to bring prestige to Lorenzo, but did not survive long in its new setting, as was often the case with non-native species.
Lorenzo the Magnificent receives the tribute of the ambassadors by Giorgio Vasari and Marco da Faenza (Palazzo Vecchio fresco) (1556–58)
"Hannibal Crossing the Alps," oil on canvas, Nicolas Poussin (1594–1665)
Nicolas Poussin (1594–1665)
Don Diego was the name of an Asian elephant who was carted around Europe to entertain at multiple European courts since 1626. He arrived in Portugal and was transported (mostly by foot) through Spain, England, France, the Lowlands, Germany, and Austria before arriving in Rome.
Poussin, cont.
Owning exotic animals was a popular way to display luxury and power in Renaissance Europe. Taming them was considered a demonstration of one's ability to control nature. Manuel the Ist of Portugal was especially interested in importing elephants and rhinos from Asia to parade through the streets of Lisbon. The tradition continued across Europe and included zebras, camels, lions, monkeys, large wild cats, birds, and more.
Royalty gave and received exotic animals, but these gifts came with the cost of feeding and housing and were often considered an imposition. Eventually Don Diego was rented out to private citizens who hoped to recoup their investments by charging admission to viewings and performances. Some of the tricks that were documented were his ability to drink wine from a glass, smoke tobacco through a reed, peel an orange using his tusk to break the skin, and use his trunk to steal treats from his minder's pocket. Life was not easy for a travelling elephant. He walked hundreds of miles across Europe, slept on cold floors of palaces or town halls- the only places large enough to contain him, and remained chained up when not walking.
The naturalist Cassiano del Pozzo, of Paper Museum fame, urged the painter Nicolas Poussin to paint him. Poussin added Hannibal to the elephant's back to elevate a natural history illustration into a history painting. The figures also help to indicate the scale of the animal.
The elephants is depicted in the conventional illustration format, standing on flat ground in profile view. It was the second elephant to appear in Rome.
RICE, LOUISE. “Poussin’s Elephant.” Renaissance Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 2, 2017, pp. 548–93. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26560333. Accessed 26 Feb. 2025.
Don Diego, Pietro Testa engraving, 1630
Like his contemporaries, Rembrandt seized the opportunity to draw animals from life- especially rare ones. These studies were done from an elephant named Hansken, who was dragged around Europe in the 1630s and 40s to perform tricks for paying audience members.
When she died, her skeleton was displayed at the Uffize museum and then moved to the University of Florence. Her remains were used for the first scientific description of an Asian elephant, making her the holotype.
from Maneige Royal, horse training manual writte by Antoine de Pluvinel and illust. by de Passe, pub. 1625
De Passe was a master engraver who wrote a 5 volume manual on drawing, which covered proportions, drawing the male nude, the female nude, the study of contemporary master drawings, and the animal kingdom. He attempted to establish an ideal form of an elephant based on the rules of geometry and his understanding of mathematical proportions as described by Durer, Da Vinci, and others.
Many artists of the 16th and 17th centuries attempted to develop a systematic approach to drawing humans and horses in profile using geometry. Drawing horses convincingly was an important skill for artists of the day as horses were an important part of life. They were the primary means of transportation, were used in farming, and a status symbol of the aristocracy. De Passe applied the approach to drawing other animals and in three dimensions.
Minerva as the patroness of the arts, engraving-- frontispiece of "Van 't Licht der Teken en Schilderkonst" (a drawing manual)
for further reading on De Passe
Gerard van Groeningen, Commemorative Print of the Asian Elephant Emanuel, in Eight Different Poses, 1563 or shortly thereafter. Etching,
Antonio Tempesta, The Golden Age, 1599
Commemorative Print of the Asian Elephant Don Diego, 1629
Exhibition of the Rhino, by Pietro Longhi, 1751
This painting depicts the rhino, named Clara. She was orphaned by hunters who killed her mother and was raised in Bengal by the director of the Dutch East India company until she was too large to take care of. He turned her over to a ship's captain, who brought her to Holland and took her on a tour of the major European cities. She's depicted here by Venetians in carnival costumes, as she was used in the festivities. It is not know if her horn was removed for reasons of health or safety, but the tamer on the left holds it in his hand.
Jan Wandelaar (1690-1759) illustration for Bernhard Albinus's book on anatomy (1697-1770)
Wandelaar depicted the same rhino in the background of some of his anatomical studies. This rhino had been brought to Amsterdam as part of her European tour.
Nicolas Hüet the Younger, “Study of the Giraffe Given to Charles X by the Viceroy of Egypt” (1827), watercolor
In the 1820s, three other European rulers received giraffes as gifts, all sent by the viceroy of Egypt, Muhammed Ali, in a diplomatic gesture to maintain friendly relations after his efforts to suppress Greek opposition to Ottoman rule.
Zerafa, the giraffe given to King Charles X, was transported by ship from Sudan to Marseilles and then escorted by two Sudanese caretakers and the naturalist Etienne Geoffrey Saint-Hilaire on the 550 mile walk to Paris.
Stag Hunt, 1544
Hunting laws changed at the turn of the 16th century so that princes were given sovereignty over territorial states. They received increased control of the forests and peasants were deprived of access to hunting. Peasants could expect their crops to be trampled by hunting parties and were forced to provide free room and board to the hunters and their animals.
Meat had become a staple of the royal courts by this time and only princes were allowed to hunt big game. Aristocracy and the higher clergy could hunt small game and large birds.
Once Rembrandt established himself and became a highly paid artist, he collected the naturalia and art objects to assemble a cabinet of curiosities, as was expected of the upper class.
He would not have been allowed to participate in the highly regulated activity of hunting, as it was reserved for the nobility and state officials.
This was painted at a high point in his career, when he had married into a wealthy family, was finally praised by the critics, and had received royal commissions from the court that were a high honor. This self-portrait in hunter's clothes is most often read as a signal of his aspirations to wealth and social status.